Skip to main content
Is 5G dangerous to us?

Does radiation affect our physical well-being?

Some people worry about 5G damaging their health. Sleep disorders, tinnitus, headaches – some even believe they can sense electromagnetic fields and feel them affecting their body. But is this even possible? Read on for more about the most frequent complaints and answers to pressing questions.

Dizziness, headaches, sleep disorders, tinnitus? Didn’t they just put up a mobile phone mast in the neighbourhood? For almost 40 years, people have been ascribing symptoms, some of them quite severe, to electrical, magnetic and electromagnetic fields. The collective term “electrohypersensitivity” is often used as a term for the idea that these fields might affect our physical and mental well-being. 

Those affected used to blame the domestic electricity supply for their complaints, some of which were serious and measurable. Now, with the expansion of mobile networks progressing, around a third of them suspect that their symptoms are being caused by radio frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Complaints mentioned in this respect include skin disorders such as rashes, tingling or burning sensations along with aching limbs, exhaustion, heart palpitations, nosebleeds, nausea, digestive disorders, reduced learning ability or cognitive performance and problems with memory retention or ability to respond. 

Many of these people now fear that their symptoms might be exacerbated by the expansion of the 5G network. 

Electromagnetic hypersensitivty – a perception of truth 

“Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields” (IEI-EMF) is spoken of colloquially as “electrohypersensitivity” or “electromagnetic hypersensitivity” (EHS). Those affected think they may be more sensitive or susceptible than others to electrical, magnetic and electromagnetic fields. This is found above all in industrial countries, and most especially in Germany and Scandinavia: some sections of the population consider themselves to be “electrosensitive” – although the people in question almost never use the term. In Germany, people claiming to experience such effects amount to between 1.5 and 10 per cent of the overall population. For a few, the psychological strain is as severe as that they withdraw from social spaces. 

Since the beginning of the 1980s, the connection between the above-named symptoms and electrical, magnetic and electromagnetic fields has been investigated in a wide variety of scientific studies: 

Sleep quality and sleep disorders 

Among the most commonly perceived symptoms of any potential electrohypersensitivity are sleep disorders or an impairment of sleep quality. However, there has so far been no proof of any connection. To date, no study has been able to demonstrate any negative influence of electromagnetic fields upon sleeping behaviour. It was observed in a few studies that the quality of the subject’s sleep deteriorated once a base station had been installed in the vicinity of the subject’s home. However, this happened whether or not the station had been started up, suggesting that concern about potential health damage was the actual cause of sleep impairment rather than the electromagnetic fields. 

Reduced learning ability or cognitive performance 

Scientific studies have been unable to establish any connection between electromagnetic fields and the well-being or cognitive performance – that is to say, mental performance – of either adults or children. Studies involving young and older mobile phone users show that mobiles, not mobile phone masts, are capable of slightly influencing brain activity, although this is only visible on an EEG. This effect is not subjectively discernible and is not reflected in behaviour, cognitive performance or sleep quality. 

Impairment of hearing or vision, triggering of tinnitus 

None of the three projects conducted within the framework of the German Mobile Telecommunication Research Programme (DMF) of the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) has demonstrated that mobile communications have any influence upon our hearing or sight. They did however rule out one particular notion: proximity to radiation sources does not trigger tinnitus. 

All the studies indicate that mobile communications do not affect our well-being 

National and international studies all indicate consistently that electromagnetic fields cannot be sensed by human beings. Likewise, science has to date been unable to establish any connection between electromagnetic fields in the range below the limits and health complaints – including sleep disorders and tinnitus. According to the BfS, there is currently no objective and verifiable diagnosis for electrohypersensitivity. No plausible mechanism of action is known. Overall, the investigations conducted suggest that there is no health risk. This appraisal by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection is also shared by the World Health Organization (WHO) and by the EU’s Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) managed by the European Commission. 

With a view to ruling out any possible risks, the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety is planning further investigations into the influence of electromagnetic fields on well-being and health. Recent studies also take the expansion of the 5G mobile network into account. 

So why do these people feel so bad? 

There are clear indications that careful behavioural therapy steps can alleviate the symptoms of electrosensitive patients. This suggests that their complaints are at least partly psychosomatic – in essence products of the subject’s mental perception. It is possible that such complaints can be caused by the so-called nocebo effect

The nocebo effect 

The symptoms developed by patients with IEI-EMF are therefore not caused by the actual electromagnetic fields. Such symptoms might perhaps be triggered by the sight of a mobile communications installation or power supply line – by expectation and concern about the complaints these installations might cause. In DMF studies, test subjects also developed complaints when, for example, mobile phone masts had already been erected but had not yet been connected (sham exposure). The appearance of symptoms can also be attributed to other factors, such as poor air supply or stress in the subject’s working or living environment. 

Patients often blame electromagnetic fields for aetiological symptoms that are actually attributable to a physical illness. In such cases, medical advice should be sought urgently, as health complaints should always be taken seriously. Following treatment by professionals, a self-help group for affected people can be of valuable help. 

article.sources

  1. John Haine (2019). 5G health fears: An Epidemiological Approach (S. 23). Cambridge Wireless Journal. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Wireless. Umweltbundesamt (2019). Negative Effekte ohne Wirkstoff: Der Nocebo-Effekt. [14.07.2020].
  2. Häuser W, Hansen E, Enck P (2012). Nocebo Phenomena in Medicine. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 109(26): 459–465.
  3. Informationszentrum Mobilfunk.de, Technische Universität Illmenau und Kinderumwelt gemeinnützige GmbH. Medizinisch relevante Aspekte des Mobilfunks. Eine Information für Ärzte. [14.07.2020].
  4. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS). Wissenschaftlich diskutierte biologische und gesundheitliche Wirkungen hochfrequenter elektromagnetischer Felder. [14.07.2020].
  5. Deutsches Mobilfunk Forschungsprogramm (DMF). Ergänzende Informationen über Elektrosensible. [14.07.2020].
  6. Informationszentrum Mobilfunk.de. Technische Universität Illmenau, Kinderumwelt gemeinnützige GmbH. Medizinisch relevante Aspekte des Mobilfunks. Eine Information für Ärzte, S. 16.
  7. World Health Organization (WHO). Elektromagnetische Felder und öffentliche Gesundheit – Elektromagnetische Hypersensitivität (Elektrosensibilität). [14.07.2020].
  8. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS). Wissenschaftlich diskutierte biologische und gesundheitliche Wirkungen hochfrequenter elektromagnetischer Felder. [14.07.2020].
  9. Umweltbundesamt. Negative Effekte ohne Wirkstoff: Der Nocebo-Effekt. [14.07.2020].
  10. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS)(Hg.). Ressortforschungsberichte zur Kerntechnischen Sicherheit und Strahlenschutz. Differenzierte Betrachtung der Nutzung und der Wahrnehmung des Mobilfunks. Vorhaben FM8854. [21.07.2020].
  11. Strahlenschutzkommission. Biologische Auswirkungen des Mobilfunks. Gesamtschau. Stellungnahme der Strahlenschutzkommission. [14.07.2020].
  12. Deutscher Bundestag. Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Dr. Bettina Hoffmann, Margit Stumpp, Sylvia Kotting-Uhl und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN. Drucksache 19/17939. Auswirkungen von hochfrequenter elektromagnetischer Strahlung auf die menschliche Gesundheit und Umwelt, S.4. [14.07.2020].
  13. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS)(Hg.). Ressortforschungsberichte zum Strahlenschutz. Einfluss hochfrequenter elektromagnetischer Felder auf die Gehirnaktivität, Schlaf und kognitive Leistungsfähigkeit älterer Frauen. Vorhaben 3614S30012. [14.07.2020].
  14. Deutsches Mobilfunk Forschungsprogramm (DMF). Untersuchung der Schlafqualität bei elektrosensiblen Anwohnern von Basisstationen unter häuslichen Bedingungen. [14.07.2020].
  15. Deutsches Mobilfunk Forschungsprogramm (DMF). Untersuchung der Schlafqualität bei Anwohnern einer Basisstation - Experimentelle Studie zur Objektivierung möglicher psychologischer und physiologischer Effekte unter häuslichen Bedingungen.
  16. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS)(Hg.). Ressortforschungsberichte zum Strahlenschutz. Einfluss hochfrequenter elektromagnetischer Felder auf die Gehirnaktivität, Schlaf und kognitive Leistungsfähigkeit älterer Männer. Vorhaben 3616S82430. [14.07.2020].
  17. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS)(Hg.). Ressortforschungsberichte zur Kerntechnischen Sicherheit und Strahlenschutz. Probandenstudie zur Untersuchung des Einflusses der für TETRA genutzten Signalcharakteristik auf kognitive Funktionen. Vorhaben FM8846. [14.07.2020].
  18. Deutsches Mobilfunk Forschungsprogramm (DMF). Untersuchungen an Probanden unter Exposition mit hochfrequenten elektromagnetischen Feldern von Mobiltelefonen. [02.02.2022].
  19. Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Literaturübersicht im Rahmen des Projekts Probandenstudie zur Untersuchung des Einflusses der für TETRA genutzten Signalcharakteristik auf kognitive Funktionen. [02.02.2022].
  20. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS)(Hg.). Ressortforschungsberichte zur Kerntechnischen Sicherheit und Strahlenschutz. Probandenstudie zur Untersuchung des Einflusses der für TETRA genutzten Signalcharakteristik auf kognitive Funktionen. Vorhaben FM8846.  [14.07.2020].
  21. Deutscher Bundestag. Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Dr. Bettina Hoffmann, Margit Stumpp, Sylvia Kotting-Uhl und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN. Drucksache 19/17939. Auswirkungen von hochfrequenter elektromagnetischer Strahlung auf die menschliche Gesundheit und Umwelt, S.4. [14.07.2020].
  22. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. Opinion on Potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). [14.07.2020].
  23. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS). Anhörung des des Ausschusses für Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz am 07.12.2006 zum Thema "Einfluss des Mobilfunks auf die menschliche Befindlichkeit". Fragenkatalog (Stand 30.10.06). Beantwortung der Fragen durch das Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz. [14.07.2020].
  24. BAF 2012; Untersuchungen an Probanden unter Exposition mit hochfrequenten elektromagnetischen Feldern von Mobiltelefonen.
  25. Van den Bergh O, Brown rJ, Petersen S et al. (2017). Idiopathic environmental intolerance: A comprehensive model. Clinical Psychological Science. 5 (3): 551–567. DOI: 10.1177/2167702617693327. [14.07.2020].
  26. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit. Forschungsrahmen und Ressortforschungsplan 2019. [14.07.2020].
  27. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit. Forschungsrahmen und Ressortforschungsplan 2020. [14.07.2020].

Stellen Sie eine Frage oder sagen Sie uns Ihre Meinung

Haben Sie Fragen oder Anregungen? Lassen Sie es uns wissen. Schreiben Sie unseren Expertinnen und Experten oder tauschen Sie sich mit anderen aus.

Zum Online-Dialog

More about Is 5G dangerous to us?

Do mobile communications damage cells and DNA?

Some people distrust mobile communications – they worry that the radiation might damage their health. 5G...

Does 5G weaken our immune system?

One of the best-known conspiracy theories associated with the coronavirus pandemic holds that the SARS-CoV-2 virus...

BfS, WHO, etc.: institutions concerned with radiation protection

People have been researching the potential health risks of radiation for many years now. On both...